Hindu–German Conspiracy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ghadar di Gunj, an early Ghadarite compilation of nationalist and socialist literature, was banned in India in 1913.

The Hindu–German Conspiracy^(name) refers to a series of plans formulated between 1914 and 1917 to initiate a Pan-Indian rebellion against the British Raj during World War I. The conspirators included radical nationalists in India, the Ghadar Party in the United States and the Indian independence committee in Germany.^[1][2][3] The conspiracy was drawn up at the beginning of the War, and was extensively supported by Irish Republican movement, the German Foreign Office and the German consulate in San Francisco, as well as some help from Ottoman Turkey. The most prominent plan attempted to foment unrest and trigger a Pan-Indian mutiny in the British Indian Army from Punjab to Singapore. This plot was planned to be executed in February 1915 with the aim of overthrowing the Raj from the Indian subcontinent. The February mutiny was ultimately thwarted when British intelligence infiltrated the Ghadarite movement, arresting key figures. Mutinies in smaller units and garrisons within India were also crushed.

Other related events include the 1915 Singapore Mutiny, the Annie Larsen arms plot, the Jugantar-German plot, the German mission to Kabul, the mutiny of the Connaught Rangers in India, as well as, by some accounts, the Black Tom explosion in 1916. Parts of the conspiracy also saw efforts at subversion in the British Indian Army in the Middle-Eastern theatre of World War I.

The Indo-Irish-German alliance and the conspiracy were the target of a worldwide British intelligence effort, which was successful in preventing further attempts. American intelligence agencies arrested key figures in the aftermath of the Annie Larsen affair in 1917. The conspiracy resulted in the Lahore conspiracy case trials in India as well as the Hindu German Conspiracy Trial—at the time the longest and most expensive trial ever held in the United States.^[1]

This series of events was consequential to the Indian independence movement. Though largely subdued by the end of World War I, it came to be a major factor in reforming the Raj's Indian policy.^[4] Similar efforts were made during World War II in Germany, Italy, and in Southeast Asia which saw the formations of Indische Legion, Battaglione Azad Hindoustan and Indian National Army respectively.

Contents [hide] 1 Background 1.1 Indian revolutionary underground 1.2 Indian and Irish networks 1.3 Ghadar Party 1.4 Germany and the Berlin Committee 2 Conspiracy 2.1 East Asia 2.2 Europe and United States 2.3 Pan-Indian mutiny 2.4 February 1915 2.5 Christmas Day Plot 2.6 Afghanistan and the Middle East 2.7 Culmination 3 Counter intelligence 3.1 In Asia 3.2 In Europe and the Middle East 3.3 In the United States 4 Trials 5 Impact 5.1 Political impact 5.2 International relations 5.3 Ghadar Party and IIC 5.4 World War II 6 Commemoration 7 Note on the name 8 Notes and references 9 External links

Background

Nationalism had been on the rise in India throughout the last decades of the 1800s as a result of the social, economic and political changes that were instituted in the country through the greater part the Century.^{[5][6][7][8][9]} The Indian National Congress founded in 1885 developed as a major platform for loyalist's demands of political liberalisation and increased autonomy. The nationalist movement growing with foundations of underground groups in the 1890s. It developed to be particularly strong, radical and violent in Bengal and Punjab, along with smaller but nonetheless notable movements in Maharashtra, Madras and other places of South India.^[10] In Bengal the revolutionaries were, more often that not, the educated youth of the urban middle class Bhadralok community that epitomised the "classic" Indian revolutionary, while in Punjab organised violence was sustained by the rural and military society.^[11]

[edit] Indian revolutionary underground

Main article: Revolutionary movement for Indian independence

See also: Delhi-Lahore Conspiracy, Rash Behari Bose, and Jugantar

Rash Behari Bose, key leader of the Delhi-Lahore Conspiracy and, later, of the February plot.

The controversial 1905 partition of Bengal had a widespread political impact. Acting as a further stimulus for the radical nationalist opinion in India and abroad, it became a focal issue for Indian revolutionaries.^[12][13][14] Revolutionary organisations like Jugantar and Anushilan Samiti had emerged in the 1900s. A number of events of political terrorism were witnessed. This included assassinations and attempted assassinations of civil servants, prominent public figures and Indian informants, including one in 1907 aimed to kill the Bengal Lieutenant-Governor Sir Andrew Fraser. The culmination was the 1912 Delhi-Lahore Conspiracy, led by erstwhile Jugantar member Rash Behari Bose, to assassinate the then Viceroy of India, Charles Hardinge. In the aftermath of this event, the British Indian police made concentrated police and intelligence efforts to destroy the Bengali and Punjabi revolutionary underground. Though the movement came under intense pressure for some time, Rash Behari successfully evaded capture for nearly three years. By the time the World War I had begun in Europe, the revolutionary movement had revived in Punjab and Bengal. In Bengal the movement, with a safe haven in the French base of Chandernagore, was strong enough to nearly paralyse the state administration.^[15][16][17] The earliest mention of a conspiracy for armed revolution in India is found in Nixon's Report on Revolutionary Organisation which reported that Jatin Mukherjee (Bagha Jatin) and Naren Bhattacharya had met the Crown Prince of Germany during the latter's visit to Calcutta in 1912, and obtained an assurance that arms and ammunition would be supplied to them.^[18] During the same time, an increasingly strong Pan-Islamic movement started developing, mainly in the north and north-west regions of India. With the onset of the war, the members of this movement formed an important component of the conspiracy.^[19]

Indian and Irish networks

Main articles: Irish Republican Movement and India House

See also: Clan na Gael, Sinn Féin, Roger Casement, and John Devoy

At the time of the partition of Bengal, the India House was founded in London by Shyamji Krishna Varma and received extensive support from notable expatriate Indians including Madam Bhikaji Cama, Lala Lajpat Rai, S.R. Rana, and Dadabhai Naoroji. The organisation — ostensibly a residence for Indian students — in reality sought to promote extremist nationalist opinion and anti-colonial work. India House drew young radical activists of the likes of M. L. Dhingra, V. D. Savarkar, V. N. Chatterjee, M. P. T. Acharya and Lala Har Dayal.^[20][21][22] It developed links with the revolutionary movement in India and nurtured it with arms, funds and propaganda. The Indian Sociologist and other literature published by the house came to be banned in India as "seditious". Under V. D. Savarkar's leadership, the house rapidly developed as a centre for intellectual and political activism and a meeting ground for radical revolutionaries among Indian students in Britain,^[23][24][25] earning the moniker "The most dangerous organisation outside India" from Valentine Chirol.^[26][27] The culmination was in 1909 in London, when M. L. Dhingra fatally shot Sir W. H. Curzon Wyllie, political aide-de-camp to the Secretary of State for India. In the aftermath of the assassination, the India House was rapidly suppressed by the Metropolitan Police and the Home Office.^[28] It's leadership fled to Europe and the United States. Some like Chatterjee moved to Germany, Har Dayal and many others moved to Paris.^[20][21]

The example of London India House was emulated in similar organisations opened in the United States and in Japan.^[29] Krishna Varma nurtured close interactions with Turkish and Egyptian nationalists and the Irish Republican movement in the United States. The Pan-Aryan Association — modeled after Krishna Varma's Indian Home Rule Society — was founded in New York in 1906 through the joint efforts of Mohammed Barkatullah, S.L. Joshi and George Freeman.^[30] Barkatullah himself was closely associated with Krishna Varma during a previous stay in London, and his subsequent career in Japan also put him at the heart of Indian political activities there.^[30] An "India House" itself was founded in Manhattan in New York in January 1908 by Myron Phelp, an acquaintance of Krishna Varma and an admirer of Swami Vivekananda.^[31] Amidst a growing Indian student population, erstwhile members of the India House in London were able to extend the nationalist work across the Atlantic. Articles from the Indian Sociologist were reprinted in the Gaelic American while liberal press laws allowed free circulation of The Indian Sociologist. Such nationalist literature and pamphlets could be shipped freely across the world.^[31] New York increasingly became an important centre for the Indian movement, such that Free Hindustan— a political revolutionary journal closely mirroring the Indian Sociologist and the Gaelic American published by Taraknath Das—^[1] moved in 1908 from Vancouver and Seattle to New York. Das was able to establish extensive collaboration with the Gaelic American with help from George Freeman before it was proscribed in 1910 under British diplomatic pressure.^[32] This Irish collaboration with Indian revolutionaries resulted in some of the early but failed efforts to smuggle arms into India, including a 1908 attempt on-board a ship called the SS Moraitis which sailed from New York for the Persian Gulf before it was searched at Smyrna.^[33][34] The Irish community later provided valuable intelligence, logistics, communication, media, and legal support to the German, Indian, and Irish conspirators. Those involved in this liaison, and later involved in the plot, included major Irish republicans and Irish-American nationalists like John Devoy, Joseph McGarrity, Roger Casement, Eamon de Valéra, Father Peter Yorke and Larry de Lacey.^[1] These pre-war collusions effectively set-up a network which, as war began in Europe, was tapped into by the German Foreign office.^[1]

Ghadar Party

An immigrant Punjabi family in America. c. 1900s.

Main article: Ghadar Party

See also: Har Dayal, Sohan Singh Bhakna, and Taraknath Das

The Pacific coast of North America saw large scale Indian immigration in the 1900s, especially from Punjab which was facing an economic depression. The Canadian government met this influx with a series of legislations aimed at limiting the entry of South Asians into Canada, and restricting the political rights of those already in the country. The Punjabi community had hitherto been an important loyal force for the British Empire and the Commonwealth, and the community had expected, to honour its commitment, equal welcome and rights from the British and commonwealth governments as extended to British and white immigrants. These legislations fed growing discontent, protests and anti-colonial sentiments within the community. Faced with increasingly difficult situations, the community began organising itself into political groups. A large number of Punjabis also moved to the United States, but they encountered similar political and social problems.^[17] Meanwhile, India House and nationalist activism of Indian students had begun declining in the East Coast towards 1910, but gradually shifted west to San Francisco. The arrival at this time of Har Dayal from Europe bridged the gap between the intellectual agitators in New York and the predominantly Punjabi labour workers and migrants in the west coast, and laid the foundations of the Ghadar movement.^[32]

The Ghadar Party, initially the Pacific Coast Hindustan Association, was formed in 1913 in the United States under the leadership of Har Dayal, with Sohan Singh Bhakna as its president. It drew members from Indian immigrants, largely from Punjab.^[17] Many of its members were also from the University of California at Berkeley including Dayal, Tarak Nath Das, Kartar Singh Sarabha and V.G. Pingle. The party quickly gained support from Indian expatriates, especially in the United States, Canada and Asia. Ghadar meetings were held in Los Angeles, Oxford, Vienna, Washington, and Shanghai.^[35]

Ghadar's ultimate goal was to overthrow British colonial authority in India by means of an armed revolution. It viewed the Congress-led mainstream movement for dominion status modest and the latter's constitutional methods as soft. Ghadar's foremost strategy was to entice Indian soldiers to revolt.^[17] To that end, in November 1913 Ghadar established the Yugantar Ashram press in San Francisco. The press produced the Hindustan Ghadar newspaper and other nationalist literature.^[35]

Towards the end of 1913, the party established contact with prominent revolutionaries in India, including Rash Behari Bose. An Indian edition of the Hindustan Ghadar essentially espoused the philosophies of anarchism and revolutionary terrorism against British interests in India. Political discontent and violence mounted in Punjab, and Ghadarite publications that reached Bombay from California were deemed seditious and banned by the Raj. These events, compounded by evidence of prior Ghadarite incitement in the Delhi-Lahore Conspiracy of 1912, led the British government to pressure the American State Department to suppress Indian revolutionary activities and Ghadarite literature, which emanated mostly from San Francisco.^[36][37]

Germany and the Berlin Committee

Main article: Berlin Committee

See also: Imperial Germany, Theobald von Bethmann Hollweg, Arthur Zimmerman, and Franz von Papen

With the onset of World War I, an Indian revolutionary group called the Berlin Committee (later called the Indian Independence Committee) was formed in Germany. Its chief architects were C. R. Pillai and V. N. Chatterjee. ^[38][39] The committee drew members from Indian students and erstwhile members of the India House including Abhinash Bhattacharya, Dr. Abdul Hafiz, Padmanabhan Pillai, A. R. Pillai, M. P. T. Acharya and Gopal Paranjape. As part of the Drang Nach Osten, Germany had earlier opened the Intelligence bureau for the East headed by archaeologist and historian Max von Oppenheim. Oppenheim and Arthur Zimmermann, the State Secretary for Foreign Affairs of the German Empire, actively supported the Berlin committee, which had links with Jatin Mukherjee— a Jugantar Party member and at the time one of the leading revolutionary figures in Bengal.^{[15][20][40][41]} The office of the twentyfive strong committee at No.38 Wielandstrasse was accorded full embassy status.^[42]

The German Chancellor Theobald von Bethmann Hollweg authorised German activity against India as World War I broke out in September 1914. Germany decided to actively support the Ghadarite plans.^[38] Using the links established between Indian and Irish residents in Germany (including Irish nationalist and poet Roger Casement) and the German Foreign Office, Oppenheim tapped into the Indo-Irish network in the United States. Har Dayal had helped organise the Ghadar party before being arrested in the United States in 1914. He however jumped bail and made his way to Switzerland, leaving the party and publications in the charge of Ram Chandra Bharadwaj, who became the Ghadar president in 1914. The German consulate in San Francisco was tasked to make contact with Ghadar leaders in California. A naval lieutenant by the name of Wilhelm von Brincken with the help of the Indian nationalist journalist Tarak Nath Das and an intermediary by the name of Charles Lattendorf established links with Bharadwaj. Meanwhile in Switzerland the Berlin committee was able to convince Har Dayal that organising a revolution in India was feasible.^[2]

Conspiracy

See also: Komagata Maru

Punjabi Sikhs aboard the Komagata Maru in Vancouver's English Bay, 1914. The passengers were not allowed to land in Canada and the ship was forced to return to India. The events surrounding the Komagata Maru incident served as a catalyst for the Ghadarite cause.

In May 1914, the Canadian government refused to allow the 400 Indian passengers of the ship Komagata Maru to disembark at Vancouver. The voyage had been planned as an attempt to circumvent Canadian exclusion laws that effectively prevented Indian immigration. Before the ship reached Vancouver, its approach was announced on German radio, and British Columbian authorities were prepared to prevent the passengers from entering Canada. The incident became a focal point for the Indian community in Canada which rallied in support of the passengers and against the government's policies. After a 2 month legal battle, 24 of the them were allowed to immigrate. The ship was escorted out of Vancouver by the Protected cruiser HMCS Rainbow and returned to India. On reaching Calcutta, the passengers were detained under the Defence of India Act at Budge Budge by the British Indian government, which made efforts to forcibly transport them to Punjab. This caused rioting at Budge Budge and resulted in fatalities on both sides.^[43] Ghadar leaders like Barkatullah and Taraknath Das used the inflammatory passions surrounding the Komagata Maru event as a rallying point and successfully brought many disaffected Indians in North America into the party's fold.^[44]

The British Indian Army, meanwhile, was contributing significantly to the Allied war effort in World War I. Consequently a reduced force, estimated to have been 15,000 troops in late 1914, was stationed in India.^[45] It was in this scenario that concrete plans for organising uprisings in India were made.

In September 1913 a Ghadarite named Mathra Singh visited Shanghai to promote the nationalist cause amongst Indians there, followed by a visit to India in January 1914 when Singh circulated Ghadar literature amongst Indian soldiers through clandestine sources before leaving for Hong Kong. Singh reported that the situation in India as favourable for revolution.^[44][46]

By October 1914, a large number of Ghadarites had returned to India and were assigned tasks like contacting Indian revolutionaries and organisations, spreading propaganda and literature, and arranging to get arms into the country.^[47] The first group of 60 Ghadarites led by Jawala Singh, left San Francisco for Canton aboard the steamship Korea on 29 August. They were to sail on to India, where they would be provided with arms to organise a revolt. At Canton, more Indians joined, and the group, now numbering about 150, sailed for Calcutta on a Japanese vessel. They were to be joined by more Ghadarites arriving in smaller groups. During the September — October time period, about 300 Indians left for India in various ships like SS Siberia, Chinyo Maru, China, Manchuria, SS Tenyo Maru, SS Mongolia and SS Shinyo Maru.^[38][46][47] Although the Korea’s party itself was uncovered and arrested on arrival at Calcutta, a successful underground network was established between the United States and India, through Shanghai, Swatow, and Siam. Tehl Singh, the Ghadar operative in Shanghai, is believed to have spent $30,000 for helping the revolutionaries to get into India.^[48] The Ghadarites in India were able to establish contact with sympathisers within the British Indian Army as well as build networks with underground revolutionary groups.

East Asia

Efforts had begun as early as 1911 to procure arms and smuggle them into India.^[49] When a clear idea of the conspiracy emerged, more earnest and elaborate plans were made to obtain arms and to enlist international support. Herambalal Gupta, who had arrived in the United States in 1914 at the Berlin Committee's directives, took over the leadership of American wing of the conspiracy after the failure of the SS Korea mission. Gupta immediately began efforts to obtain men and arms. While men were in plentiful supply with more and more Indians coming forward to join the Ghadarite cause, obtaining arms for the uprising proved to be more difficult.^[50]

The revolutionaries started negotiations with the Chinese government through James Dietrich, who held Sun Yat Sen's power of attorney, to buy a million rifles. However, the deal fell through when it was realised that the weapons offered were obsolete flintlocks and muzzle loaders. From China, Gupta went to Japan to try to procure arms and to enlist Japanese support for the Indian independence movement. However, he was forced into hiding within 48 hours when he came to know that the Japanese authorities planned to hand him over to the British.^[51] Later reports indicated he was protected at this time by Toyama Mitsuru.^[52]

The Indian Nobel laureate Rabindranath Tagore, a strong supporter of Pan-Asianism, met Japanese premier Count Terauchi and Count Okuma, a former premier, in an attempt to enlist support for the Ghadarite movement.^[53] Tarak Nath Das urged Japan to align with Germany, on the grounds that American war preparation could actually be directed against Japan.^[53] Later in 1915, Abani Mukherjee— a Jugantar activist and associate of Rash Behari Bose— is also known to have tried unsuccessfully to arrange for arms from Japan. The Ascendancy of Li Yuanhong to Chinese Presidency in 1916, led to the negotiations reopening through his former private secretary who resided in the United States at the time. In exchange for allowing arms shipments to India via China's borders, China was offered German military assistance and the rights to 10% of any material shipped to India via China. The negotiations were ultimately unsuccessful due to Sun Yat Sen's opposition to an alliance with Germany.^[54]

Europe and United States

Main article: Annie Larsen affair

See also: Black Tom explosion

Franz von Papen, later the Chancellor of Germany briefly before Hitler's rise to power. Papen was key in organising the arms shipments.

The Indian nationalists then in Paris had, with Egyptian revolutionaries, made plans to assassinate Lord Kitchener as early as 1911. These plans were however not implmented.^[55] After the war began, This plan was revived, and Har Dayal's close associate Gobind Behari Lal visited Liverpool in March 1915 from New York to put this plan in action. He may also have intended at this time to bomb the docks in Liverpool. However, these plans ultimately failed.^[55] Chattopadhyaya also attempted at this time to revive links with the remnants of India House that survived in London, and through Swiss, German and English sympathisers then resident in Britain. Among them were a Swiss woman by the name of Meta Brunner, an Indian man by the name of Vishna Dube and his common law German wife Anna Brandt, and an English woman in Yorkshire by the name of Hilda Howsin. Chattopadhyaya's correspondences were however traced by censor, leading to the arrest of the cell.^[56] Among other plans that were considered at the time were large scale conspiracies in June 1915 to assassinate the Foreign Secretary Lord Grey and War minister Lord Kitchener. In addition, they also intended to target the French President Raymond Poincaré and Prime Minister René Viviani, the King Emmanuel III of Italy and Prime minister Antonio Salandra. These plans were coordinated with the Italian anarchists, with explosives manufactured in Italy. Barkatullah, by now in Europe and working with the Berlin Committee, arranged for these explosives to be sent to the German consulate in Zurich, from where it was expected to be taken charge of by an Italian anarchist by the name of Bertoni. However, British intelligence was able to infiltrate this plot, and successfully pressed Swiss police to expel Abdul Hafiz.^[56]

In the United States, an elaborate plan and arrangement was made to ship arms from the country and from the Far East through Shanghai, Batavia, Bangkok and Burma.^[50] Even while Herambalal Gupta was on his mission in China and Japan, other plans where explored to ship arms from the United States and East Asia. The German high command decided early on that assistance to the Indian groups would be pointless unless given on a substantial scale.^[57] In October 1914, German Vice Consul E.H von Schack in San Francisco approved the arrangements for funds and armaments. $200,000 worth of small arms and ammunition were acquired by the German military attaché Captain Franz von Papen through Krupp agents, and arranged for its shipment to India through San Diego, Java, and Burma. The arsenal included 8,080 Springfield rifles of Spanish-American War vintage, 2,400 Springfield carbines, 410 Hotchkiss repeating rifles, 4,000,000 cartridges, 500 Colt revolvers with 100,000 cartridges, and 250 Mauser pistols along with ammunition.^[57] The schooner Annie Larsen and the sailing ship SS Henry S were hired to ship the arms out of the United States and transfer it to the SS Maverick. The ownership of ships were hidden under a massive smokescreen involving fake companies and oil business in south-east Asia. For the arms shipment itself, a successful cover was set up to lead British agents to believe that the arms were for the warring factions of the Mexican Civil War.^{[2][48][58][59][60][61][62]} This ruse was successful enough that the rival Villa faction offered $15,000 to divert the shipment to a Villa controlled port.^[2]

Although the shipment was meant to supply the mutiny planned for February 1915, it was not dispatched until June of that year, by which time the conspiracy had been uncovered in India and major leaders had been arrested or gone into hiding. The plot for the shipment itself failed when disastrous coordination prevented a successful rendezvous off Socorro Island with the Maverick. The plot had already been infiltrated by British intelligence through Indian and Irish agents linked closely with the conspiracy. Upon returning to Hoquiam, Washington after a number of failed attempts, the Annie Larsen's cargo was promptly seized by US customs.^[61][62] The cargo was sold at an auction despite the German Ambassador Count Johann von Bernstoff's attempts to take possession, insisting they were meant for German East Africa.^[63] The Hindu German Conspiracy Trial opened in 1917 in the United States on charges of gun running and at the time was one of the lengthiest and most expensive trials in American legal history.^[1]

Among other events in the United States that have been linked to the conspiracy is the Black Tom explosion when, on the night of July 30, 1916, saboteurs blew up nearly 2 million tons of arms and ammunition at the Black Tom terminal at New York harbour awaiting shipment in support of the British war effort. Although blamed solely on German agents at the time, later investigations by the Directorate of Naval Intelligence in the aftermath of the Annie Larsen incident unearthed links between the Black Tom explosion and Franz von Papen, the Irish movement, the Indian movement as well as Communist elements active in the United States.^[64][65]

Pan-Indian mutiny

Main article: Ghadar Conspiracy

See also: 1915 Singapore mutiny

By the start of 1915, a large number of Ghadarites (nearly 8,000 in the Punjab province alone by some estimates) had returned to India.^[15][66] However, they were not assigned a central leadership and begun their work on an ad hoc basis. Although some were rounded up by the police on suspicion, many remained at large and began establishing contacts with garrisons in major cities like Lahore, Ferozepur and Rawalpindi. Various plans had been made to attack the military arsenal at Mian Meer, near Lahore and initiate a general uprising on November 15, 1914. In another plan, a group of Sikh soldiers, the manjha jatha, planned to start a mutiny in the 23rd Cavalry at the Lahore cantonment on 26 November. A further plan called for a mutiny to start on 30 November from Ferozepur under Nidham Singh.^[67] In Bengal, the Jugantar, through Jatin Mukherjee, established contacts with the garrison at Fort William in Calcutta.^[15][40] In August 1914, Mukherjee's group had seized a large consignment of guns and ammunition from the Rodda company, a major gun manufacturing firm in India. In December 1914, a number of politically motivated armed robberies to obtain funds were carried out in Calcutta. Mukherjee kept in touch with Rash Behari Bose through Kartar Singh and V.G. Pingle. These rebellious acts, which were until then organised separately by different groups, were brought into a common umbrella under the leadership of Rash Behari Bose in North India, V. G. Pingle in Maharashtra, and Sachindranath Sanyal in Benares.^[15][40][41] A plan was made for a unified general uprising, with the date set for February 21, 1915.^[15][40]

[edit] February 1915

The public executions of convicted mutineers at Outram Road, Singapore, c. March 1915.

In India, unaware of the delayed shipment and confident of being able to rally the Indian sepoy, the plot for the mutiny took its final shape. Under the plans, the 23rd Cavalry in Punjab was to seize weapons and kill their officers while on roll call on 21 February.^[68] This was to be followed by mutiny in the 26th Punjab, which was to be the signal for the uprising to begin, resulting in an advance on Delhi and Lahore. The Bengal cell was to look for the Punjab Mail entering the Howrah Station the next day (which would have been cancelled if Punjab was seized) and was to strike immediately. However, Punjab CID successfully infiltrated the conspiracy at the last moment through a sepoy by the name of Kirpal Singh.^[44] Sensing that their plans had been compromised, D-day was brought forward to 19 February, but even these plans found their way to the intelligence.^[68] Plans for revolt by the 130th Baluchi Regiment at Rangoon on January 21 were thwarted. Attempted revolts in the 26th Punjab, 7th Rajput, 130th Baluch, 24th Jat Artillery and other regiments were suppressed. Mutinies in Firozpur, Lahore, and Agra were also suppressed and many key leaders of the conspiracy were arrested, although some managed to escape or evade arrest. A last ditch attempt was made by Kartar Singh and V. G. Pingle to trigger a mutiny in the 12th Cavalry regiment at Meerut.^[59] Kartar Singh escaped from Lahore, but was arrested in Varanasi, and V. G. Pingle was apprehended in Meerut. Mass arrests followed as the Ghadarites were rounded up in Punjab and the Central Provinces. Rash Behari Bose escaped from Lahore and in May 1915 fled to Japan. Other leaders, including Giani Pritam Singh, Swami Satyananda Puri and others fled to Thailand.^[44][59]

On February 15, the 5th Light Infantry stationed at Singapore was among the few units to mutiny successfully. Nearly eight hundred and fifty of its troops mutinied on the afternoon of the 15th, along with nearly a hundred men of the Malay States Guides. This mutiny lasted almost seven days, and resulted in the deaths of forty-seven British soldiers and local civilians. The mutineers also released the interned crew of the SMS Emden, who were asked by the mutineers to join them but refused and actually took up arms and defended the barracks after the mutineers had left (sheltering some British refuges as well) until the prison camp was relieved.^[69] The mutiny was suppressed only after French, Russian and Japanese ships arrived with reinforcements.^[70][71] Of nearly two hundred tried at Singapore, forty seven mutineers were shot in public executions,^[72][73] the rest were transported for life to East Africa. Most of the rest were deported for life or given jail terms ranging between seven and twenty years.^[70] In all 800 mutineers were either shot imprisoned or exiled ^[69] Some historians, including Hew Strachan, argue that although Ghadar agents operated within the Singapore unit, the mutiny was isolated and not linked to the conspiracy.^[74] Others deem this as instigated by the Silk Letter Movement which became intricately related to the Ghadarite conspiracy.^[19]

Christmas Day Plot

Main articles: German plot and Bagha Jatin

See also: Jugantar

Bagha Jatin, wounded after his final battle at the banks of Burha Balang, off Balasore. His enterprise was deemed one of the most significant threats to British India in autumn 1915.

In April 1915, unaware of the failure of the Annie Larsen plan, Papen arranged, through Krupp's American representative Hans Tauscher, a second shipment of arms, consisting of 7,300 Springfield rifles, 1,930 pistols, 10 Gatling guns and nearly 3,000,000 cartridges.^[75][76] The arms were to be shipped in mid June to Surabaya in the East Indies on the Holland American steamship SS Djember. However, the intelligence network operated by Courtenay Bennett, the Consul General to New York, was able to trace the cargo to Tauscher in New York and passed the information on to the company, thwarting these plans as well.^[75] In the meantime, even after the February plot had been scuttled, the plans for an uprising continued in Bengal through the Jugantar cohort under Jatin Mukherjee (Bagha Jatin). German agents in Thailand and Burma, most prominently Emil and Theodor Helferrich— brothers of the German Finance minister Karl Helfferich— established links with Jugantar through Jitendranath Lahiri in March that year. In April, Jatin's chief lieutenant Narendranath Bhattacharya met with the Helfferichs and was informed of the expected arrival of the Maverick with arms. Although these were originally intended for Ghadar use, the Berlin Committee modified the plans, to have arms shipped into India to the eastern coast of India, through Hatia on the Chittagong coast, Raimangal in the Sunderbans and Balasore in Orissa, instead of Karachi as originally decided.^[76] From the coast of the Bay of Bengal, these would be collected by Jatin's group. The date of insurrection was fixed for Christmas Day of 1915, earning the name of The Christmas Day plot.^[77] Jatin estimated that he would be able to win over the 14th Rajput Regiment in Calcutta and cut the line to Madras at Balasore and thus take control of Bengal.^[76] Jugantar also received funds (estimated to be Rs 33,000 between June and August 1915) from The Helfferich brothers through a fictitious firm in Calcutta.^[78] However, it was at this time that the details of the Maverick and Jugantar plans were leaked to Beckett, the British Consul at Batavia, by a defecting Baltic-German agent under the alias "Oren". The Maverick was seized, while in India, police destroyed the underground movement in Calcutta as an unaware Jatin proceeded according to plan to the Bay of Bengal coast in Balasore. He was followed there by Indian police and on September 9, 1915, he and a group of five revolutionaries armed with Mauser pistols made a last stand on the banks of the river Burha Balang. Seriously wounded in a gun battle that lasted seventy five minutes, Jatin died the next day in the town of Balasore.^[15][79]

To provide the Bengal group enough time to capture Calcutta and to prevent reinforcements from being rushed in, a mutiny coinciding with Jugantar's Christmas Day insurrection was planned for Burma with arms smuggled in from Neutral Thailand. ^[79][80][81] Thailand (Siam) was a strong base for the Ghadarites, and plans for rebellion in Burma (which was a part of British India at the time) had been proposed by the Ghadar party as early as October 1914, which called for Burma to be used as a base for subsequent advance into India.^[79][81] This Siam-Burma plan was finally concluded in January 1915. Ghadarites from branches in China and United States, including leaders like Atma Ram, Thakar Singh, and Banta Singh from Shanghai and Santokh Singh and Bhagwan Singh from San Francisco, attempted to infiltrate Burma Military Police in Thailand, which was composed mostly of Sikhs and Punjabi Muslims. Early in 1915, Atma Ram had also visited Calcutta and Punjab and linked up with the revolutionary underground there, including Jugantar.^[46][82] Herambalal Gupta and the German consul at Chicago arranged to have German operatives George Paul Boehm, Henry Schult, and Albert Wehde sent to Siam through Manila with the purpose of training the Indians. Santokh Singh returned to Shangai tasked to send two expeditions, one to reach the Indian border via Yunnan and the other to penetrate upper Burma and join with revolutionary elements there.^[67] The Germans, while in Manila, also attempted to transfer the arms cargo of two German ships, the Sachsen and the Suevia, to Siam in a schooner seeking refuge at Manila harbour. However, US customs stopped these attempts. In the meantime, with the help of the German Consul to Thailand Remy, the Ghadarite established a training headquarters in the jungles near the Thai-Burma border for Ghadarites arriving from China and Canada. German Consul General at Shanghai, Knipping, sent three officers of the Peking Embassy Guard for training and in addition arranged for a Norwegian agent in Swatow to smuggle arms through.^[83] However, the Thai Police high command, which was largely British, discovered these plans and Indian police infiltrated the plot through an Indian secret agent who was revealed the details by the Austrian charge d’affaires. Thailand, although officially neutral, was allied closely with Britain and British India. On July 21, the newly arrived British Minister Herbert Dering presented Foreign Minister Prince Devawongse with the request for arrest and extradition of Ghadarites identified by the Indian agent, ultimately resulting in the arrest of leading Ghadarites in August. Only a single raid into Burma was launched by six Ghadarites, who were captured and later hanged.^[79][83][84]

Also to coincide with the proposed Jugantar insurreection in Calcutta was a planned raid on the penal colony in the Andaman islands with a German volunteer force raised from East Indies. The raid would release the political prisoners, helping to raise an expeditionary Indian force that would threaten the Indian coast.^[78][85] The plan was proposed by Vincent Kraft, a German planter in Batavia who had been wounded fighting in France. It was approved by the foreign office on May 14, 1915, after consultation with the Indian committee, and raid was planned for Christmas Day 1915 by a force of nearly one hundred Germans led by a former naval officer von Müller was raised. Knipping made plans for shipping arms to the Andaman islands. However, Vincent Kraft was a double agent, and leaked details of Knippings plans to British intelligence. His own bogus plans for the raid were in the meantime revealed to Beckett by "Oren", but given the successive failures of the Indo-German plans, the plans for the operations were abandoned on the recommendations of both the Berlin Committee and Knipping.^[86]

Afghanistan and the Middle East

Main articles: Niedermayer-Hentig Expedition and Provisional Government of India

See also: Middle Eastern theatre of World War I, Silk Letter Conspiracy, Oskar von Niedermayer, Werner Otto von Hentig, and Mahendra Pratap

Mahendra Pratap (centre) at the head of the Mission with the German and Turkish delegates in Kabul, 1915. Seated to his right is Werner Otto von Hentig.

Another arm of the conspiracy was directed at the Indian troops who were serving in Middle East, while efforts were directed at drawing Afghanistan into the war on the central side, which it was hoped would incite a nationalist or pan-Islamic uprising in India and also directly destabilise the British recruiting grounds in Punjab and India at large. After Russia's defeat in the 1905 Russo-Japanese war, her influence had declined and it was Afghanistan that was at the time seen by Britain as the only power in the sub-continent which was capable of directly threatening India.^[87]

In the spring of 1915, an Indo-German expedition was sent to Afghanistan via the overland route through Persia. Led by the exiled Indian prince Raja Mahendra Pratap, this mission sought to invite the Afghan Emir Habibullah Khan to break with Britain, declare his independence, and join the war on the Central side and invade British India. It managed to evade the considerable Anglo-Russian efforts that were directed at intercepting it in Mesopotamia and in the Persian deserts before it reached Afghanistan in August 1915.^[88][89] In Afghanistan, it was joined in Kabul by members of the pan-Islamic group Darul Uloom Deoband led by Maulana Ubaidullah Sindhi. This group had left India for Kabul at the beginning of the war while another group under Mahmud al Hasan made its way to Hijaz, where they hoped to seek support from the Afghan Emir, the Ottoman Empire and Imperial Germany for a pan-Islamic insurrection begiing in the tribal belt of North-west India.^[90][91] The Indo-German mission pressed Emir Habibullah to break from his neutral stance and open diplomatic relations with Germany, eventually hoping to rally the Emir to the German war effort.^[92][93] Habibullah Khan vacillated on the mission's proposals through much of the winter of 1915, hoping to maintain his neutral stance till the course of the war offered a concrete picture. However, the mission opened at this time secret negotiations with the pro-German elements in the Emir's court and advisory council, including his brother Nasrullah Khan and son Amanullah Khan. It found support among Afghan intellectuals, religious leaders and the Afghan press which rallied with increasingly anti-British and pro-Central articles and by 1916 forced the Raj to intercept copies of the Afghan news paper Siraj al Akhbar sent to India.^[94] It raised to the Emir a threat of a coup d'état in his country and unrest among his tribesmen, who were beginning to see him as subservient to British authority even as Turkey called for a Pan-Islamic Jihad. The Indian members in December 1915 founded the Provisional Government of India, which it was hoped would weigh on Habibullah's advisory council to aid India and force the Emir's hands. In January 1916, the Emir approved a draft treaty with Germany to buy off time. However, the Central campaign in the middle-east faltered at around this time, ending hopes that an overland route through Persia could be secured for aid and assistance to Afghanistan. The German members of the mission left Afghanistan in June 1916, ending the German intrigues in the country.^[95] Nonetheless, Mahendra Pratap and his Provisional Government stayed behind, attempting to establish links with Japan, Republican China and Tsarist Russia. After the Russian revolution, Pratap opened negotiations with the Soviet Union, visiting Trotsky in Red Petrograd in 1918, and Lenin in Moscow in 1919 before he visited the Kaiser in Berlin that year.^[96] He pressed for a joint Soviet-German offensive through Afghanistan into India, which was considered by the Soviets for some time after the 1919 coup in Afghanistan which saw Amanullah Khan instated as the Emir and the beginning of the third Anglo-Afghan war. Pratap may also have influenced the Kalmyk Project, a Soviet plan to invade India through Tibet the Himalayan buffer states.^[97][98]

In the middle eastern theatre, members of the Berlin Committee, among them were Har Dayal and M. P. T. Acharya, were sent on missions to Baghdad and Syria in the summer of 1915, tasked to infiltrate the Indian Expeditionary Force in southern Mesopotamia and Egypt and attempt to assassinate British officers.^[99] The Indian effort was divided into two groups, one consisting of a Bengali revolutionary P.N. Dutt (alias Dawood Ali Khan) and Pandurang Khankoje arrived at Bushire, where they worked with Wilhelm Wassmuss and distributed nationalist and revolutionary literature among Indian troops in Mesopotamia and Persia. The other group, working with Egyptian nationalists, attempted to block the Suez Canal.^[100] These groups carried out successful clandestine work in spreading nationalist literature and propaganda amongst the Indian troops in Mesopotamia, and on one occasion even bombed an officer's casino.^[99] Nationalist work also extended at this time to recruiting Indian prisoners of war in Constantinopole, Bushire, Kut-al-Amara.^[19][101] M.P.T. Acharya'S own works were directed at forming the Indian National Volunteer Corps with the help of Indian civilians in Turkey, in addition to recruiting Indian Prisoners of War and he is further known to have worked along with Wilhelm Wassmuss in Bushire amongst Indian troops.^[101][102] The efforts were, however, ultimately hampered by diffences between the Berlin committee members who were predominantly Hindus, and Indian revolutionaries already in Turkey who were largely Muslims.^[99] Further, the Egyptian nationalists distrusted the Berlin Committee, which was seen by the former as a German instrument.^[102]

Nonetheless, in culmination of these efforts, Indian prisoners of war from France, Turkey, Germany, and Mesopotamia—especially Basra, Bushehr, and from Kut al Amara—were recruited, raising the Indian Volunteer Corps that fought with Turkish forces in a number of fronts.^[103] The Deobandis, led by Amba Prasad Sufi, attempted to organise incursions from the western border of India from Persia, through Baluchistan, to Punjab. Amba Prasad was joined during the war by Kedar Nath Sondhi, Rishikesh Letha and Amin Chaudhry. These Indian troops were involved in the capture of the frontier city of Karman and the detention of the British consul there, and also successfully harassed Percy Sykes' Persian campaign against the Baluchi and Persian tribal chiefs who were aided by the Germans.^[104][105] The Aga Khan's brother was killed while fighting the rebels.^[106] The rebels also successfully harassed British Forces in Sistan in Afghanistan, confining them to Karamshir in Baluchistan, and later moving towards Karachi. Some reports indicate they took control of the coastal towns of Gawador and Dawar. The Baluchi chief of Bampur, having declared his independence from British rule, also joined the Ghadarites. It was not before the war in Europe turned for the worse for Turkey and Baghdad was captured by the British forces that the Ghadarite forces, their supply lines starved, were finally dislodged. They retreated to regroup at Shiraz, where they were finally defeated after a bitter fight during the siege of Shiraz. Amba Prasad Sufi was killed in this battle, but the Ghadarites carried on guerrilla warfare along with Iranian partisans until 1919.^[105][107]

[edit] Culmination

See also: Connaught Rangers

Mutiny India 1920. Jalandhar mutiny memorial at Glasnevin cemetery, Dublin.

By the end of 1917, divisions had begun appearing between the Ghadar Party in America on the one hand, and the Berlin Committee and the German high command on the other. Reports from German agents working with Ghadarites in Southeast Asia and the United States clearly indicated to the European wing a significant element of disorganisation, as well as unrealism in gauging public mood and support within the Ghadarite organisation. The failure of the February plot, the lack of bases in Southeast Asia following China's participation in the war in 1917, and the problems of supporting a Southeast Asian operation through the sea stemmed the plans significantly. Infiltration by British agents, change in American attitude and stance, and the changing fortunes of the war meant the massive conspiracy for revolution within India never succeeded.^[108]

One of the last events linked to the conspiracy derives from the Irish involvement when, on June 28, 1920, units of the Connaught Rangers mutinied at Jullundur in Punjab when five men from C Company refused to take orders from their officers, declaring their intent not to serve the King until British forces left Ireland. The mutiny spread to Solan before it was suppressed. Nearly 400 men joined the mutiny, of whom eighty-eight were subsequently court martialled. Fourteen were sentenced to death and the rest given up to 15 years in gaol. Thirteen of the men sentenced to die later had their sentences commuted to life imprisonment. 21-year-old James Daly was shot by a firing squad in Dagshai prison on November 2, 1920; he was the last member of British Forces to be executed for mutiny. Daly and John Miranda (who died in prison) were buried at the Dagshai graveyard.^{[109] [110]}

Counter intelligence

Main article: Hindu-German Conspiracy Counter-intelligence

Outlines and nascent ideas of the conspiracy began to be noted and tracked by British intelligence as early as 1911.^[111] Incidents like the Delhi-Lahore Conspiracy and the Komagata Maru incident had already alerted the CID of the existence of a large-scale network and plans for pan-Indian militant unrest. Measures were taken which focussed on Bengal—the seat of the most intense revolutionary terrorism at the time—and on Punjab, which was uncovered as a strong and militant base in the wake of Komagata Maru.^[112][113] Har Dayal's extant group was found to have strong links with Rash Behari Bose, and were "cleaned up" in the wake of the Delhi bomb case.^[113]

In Asia

See also: Charles Tegart, Oren, Vincent Kraft, and Kirpal Singh

At the outbreak of the war, Punjab CID sent teams to Hong Kong to intercept and infiltrate the returning Ghadarites, who often made little efforts to hide their plans and objectives.^[112] These teams were successful in uncovering details of the full scale of the conspiracy, as well as discovering Har Dayal's whereabouts. Immigrants returning to India were double checked against a list of revolutionaries.^[114]

In Punjab, the CID, although aware of possible plans for unrest, was not successful in infiltrating the conspiracy for the mutiny until February 1915. A dedicated force was formed, headed by the Chief of Punjab CID, and including amongst its members Liaqat Hayat Khan (later head of Punjab CID himself). In February that year, the CID was successful in recruiting the services of one Kirpal Singh to infiltrate the plan. Singh, who had a Ghadarite cousin serving in the 23rd Cavalry, was able to infiltrate the leadership, being assigned to work in his cousin's regiment. Singh was soon under suspicion of being a spy, but was able to pass on the information regarding the date and scale of the uprising to British Indian intelligence.^[115] As the date for the mutiny approached, a desperate Rash Behari Bose brought forward the D-day to the evening of February 19, which was discovered by Kirpal Singh on the very day. No attempts were made by the Ghadarites to restrain him, and he rushed to inform Liaqat Khan of the change of plans. Ordered back to his station to signal when the revolutionaries had assembled, Singh was detained by the would-be mutineers, but managed to make good his escape under the cover of answering the call of nature.^[115]

The role of German or Baltic-German double-agents, especially the agent named Oren, was also important in infiltrating and preempting the plans for Autumn rebellions in Bengal in 1915 as well as scuttling Bagha Jatin's plans in winter that year. Another source was the German double agent Vincent Kraft, a planter from Batavia, who passed information about arms shipments from Shanghai to British agents after being captured. Maps of the Bengal coast were found on Kraft when he was initially arrested and he volunteered the information that these were the intended landing sites for German arms.^[116] Kraft later fled through Mexico to Japan where he was last known to be at the end of the war.^[79] Later efforts by Mahendra Pratap's Provisional Government in Kabul were also compromised by Herambalal Gupta after he defected in 1918 and passed on information to Indian intelligence.^[117]

In Europe and the Middle East

See also: John Wallinger, Indian Political Intelligence Office, and East Persia Cordon

By the time the war broke out the Indian Political Intelligence Office, headed by John Wallinger, had expanded into Europe. In scale this office was larger than those operated by the British War Office, approaching the European intelligence network of the Secret Service Bureau. This network already had agents in Switzerland against possible German intrigues. After the outbreak of the war Wallinger, under the cover of an officer of the British General Head Quarters, proceeded to France where he operated out of Paris, working with the French Political Police, the Sûreté.^[118] Among Wallinger's recruits in the network was Somerset Maugham, who was recruited in 1915 and used his cover as author to visit Geneva while avoiding Swiss interference.^[119][120] Among other enterprises, the European intelligence network attempted to eliminate some of the Indian leaders in Europe. A British agent called Donald Gullick was dispatched to assassinate Virendranath Chattopadhaya while the latter was on his way to Geneva to meet Mahendra Pratap to offer Kaiser Wilhelm II's invitation. It is said that Somerset Maugham based a number of his stories on his first-hand experiences, modelling the character of John Ashenden after himself and Chandra Lal after Virendranath. The short story of Giulia Lazzari is a blend of Gullick's attempts to assassinate Virendranath and Mata Hari's story. Winston Churchill reportedly advised Maugham to burn 14 other stories.^[121][122]

The Czech revolutionary network in Europe also had a role in the uncovering of Bagha Jatin's plans. The network was in touch with the members in the United States, and may have also been aware of and involved in the uncovering of the earlier plots.^{[123][124][125]} The American network, headed by E.V. Voska, was a counter-espionage network of nearly 80 members who, as Habsburg subjects, were presumed to be German supporters but were involved in spying on German and Austrian diplomats. Voska had begun working with Guy Gaunt, who headed Courtenay Bennett's intelligence network, at the outbreak of the war and on learning of the plot from the Czech European network, passed on the information to Gaunt and to Tomáš Masaryk who further passed on the information the American authorities.^[124][126]

In the Middle East, British counter-intelligence was directed at preserving the loyalty of the Indian sepoy in the face of Turkish propaganda and the concept of The Caliph's Jihad, while a particularly significant effort was directed at intercepting the Kabul Mission. The East Persian Cordon was established in July 1915 in the Sistan province of Persia to prevent the Germans from crossing into Afghanistan and to protect British supply caravans in Sarhad from the Damani, Reki and Kurdish Baluchi tribal raiders who maybe tempted by German gold. Among the commanders of the Sistan force was Reginald Dyer who led it between March and October 1916.^{[127][128][129]}

In the United States

See also: W.C. Hopkinson

In the United States, the conspiracy was successfully infiltrated by British intelligence through both Irish as well as Indian channels. The activities of Ghadar on the Pacific coast were noted by W. C. Hopkinson, who was born and raised in India and spoke fluent Hindi. Initially Hopkinson had been despatched from Calcutta to keep the Indian Police informed about the doings of Taraknath Das.^[130] The Home department of the British Indian government had begun the task of actively tracking Indian seditionists on the East Coast as early as 1910. Francis Cunliffe Owen, the officer heading the Home Office agency in New York, had become thoroughly acquainted with George Freeman alias Fitzgerald and Myron Phelps, the famous New York advocate, as members of the Clan-na-Gael. Owens' efforts were successful in thwarting the SS Moraitis plan.^[131] The Ghadar Party was incidentally established after Irish Republicans, sensing infiltration, encouraged formation of an exclusively Indian society.^[34] Following this, a number of approaches were adopted, including infiltration through an Indian national named Bela Singh who successfully set up a network of agents passing on information to Hopkinson, as well as the use of the famous American Pinkerton's detective agency.^[34][132] Bela Singh was later murdered in India in the 1930s. Hopkinson was assassinated in a Vancouver courthouse by a Ghadarite named Mewa Singh, in October, 1914.^[133] An Irish double agent by the name of Charles Lamb is said to have passed on the majority of the information that compromised the Annie Larsen and ultimately helped the construction of the prosecution. An Indian operative, codenamed "C" and described most likely to have been the adventurous Chandra Kanta Chakravarty (later the chief prosecution witness in the trial), also passed on the details of the conspiracy to British and American intelligence.^[134]

Trials

Main articles: Lahore Conspiracy trial and Hindu German Conspiracy trial

The conspiracy led to a number of trials in India, most famous among them being the Lahore Conspiracy trial, which opened in Lahore in April 1915 in the aftermath of the failed February mutiny. Other trials included the Benares, Simla, Delhi, and Ferozepur conspiracy cases, and the trials of those arrested at Budge Budge.^[135] At Lahore, a special tribunal was constituted under the Defence of India Act 1915 and a total of 291 conspirators were put on trial. Of these 42 were awarded the death sentence, 114 transported for life, and 93 awarded varying terms of imprisonment. A number of these were sent to the Cellular Jail in the Andaman. Forty two defendants in the trial were acquitted. The Lahore trial directly linked the plans made in United States and the February mutiny plot. Following the conclusion of the trial, diplomatic effort to destroy the Indian revolutionary movement in the United States and to bring its members to trial increased considerably.^{[136][137][138]}

In the United States, the Hindu German Conspiracy trial commenced in the District Court in San Francisco on November 12, 1917 following the uncovering of the Annie Larsen affair. One hundred and five people participated, including members of the Ghadar Party, the former German Consul-General and Vice-Consul, and other members of staff of the German consulate in San Francisco. The trial itself lasted from November 20, 1917 to April 24, 1918. The last day of the trial was notable for the sensational assassination of the chief accused, Ram Chandra, by a fellow defendant, Ram Singh, in a packed courtroom. Singh himself was immediately shot dead by a US Marshal. In May 1917, eight Indian Nationalists of the Ghadar Party were indicted by a federal grand jury on a charge of conspiracy to form a military enterprise against Britain. In later years the proceedings were criticised as being a largely show trial designed to preempt any suggestions that the United States was joining an Imperialist war.^[11] The jury during the trial was carefully selected to exclude any Irish person with republican views or associations.^[139] Strong public support in favour of the Indians, especially the revived Anglo-phobic sentiments following the colonial provisions of the Treaty of Versailles, allowed the Ghadarite movement to revive despite British concerns.^[140]

Impact

Main article: Impact of the Hindu-German Conspiracy

The conspiracy had a significant impact on Britain's policies, both within the empire and in international relations.^{[3][36][141][142][143][144]} The outlines and plans for the nascent ideas of the conspiracy were noted and tracked by British intelligence as early as 1911.^[111] Alarmed at the agile organisation, which repeatedly reformed in different parts of the country despite being subdued in others, the chief of Indian Intelligence Sir Charles Cleveland was forced to warn that the idea and attempts at pan-Indian revolutions were spreading through India "like some hidden fire".^[111][145] A massive, concerted, and coordinated effort was required to subdue the movement. Attempts were made in 1914 to prevent the naturalisation of Tarak Nath Das as an American citizen, while successful pressure was applied to have Har Dayal interned.^[143]

Political impact

Main articles: Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms, Rowlatt Act, Rowlatt Committee, and Amritsar Massacre

See also: Defence of India act 1915

The conspiracy, judged by the British Indian Government's own evaluation at the time, and those of a number of contemporary and modern historians, was an important event in the Indian independence movement and was one of the significant threats faced by the Raj in the second decade of the 20th century.^[146][147]

In the scenario of the British war effort and the threat from the militant movement in India, it was a major factor for the passage of the Defence of India Act of 1915. Among the strongest proponents of the act was Michael O'Dwyer, then the Lieutenant Governor of Punjab, and this was largely due to the Ghadarite movement.^[148] It was also a factor that guided British political concessions as well as Whitehall's India Policy during and after World War I, including the passage of Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms which initiated the first round of political reform in the Indian subcontinent in 1917.^{[142][143][144]} The events of the conspiracy during World War I, the presence of Pratap's Kabul mission in Afghanistan and its possible links to Soviet Russia, as well as a still active revolutionary movement especially in Punjab and Bengal (as well as worsening civil unrest throughout India) led to the appointment of a Sedition committee in 1918 chaired by Sydney Rowlatt, an English judge. It was tasked to evaluate German and Bolshevik links to the militant movement in India, especially in Punjab and Bengal. On the recommendations of the committee, the Rowlatt Act, an extension of the Defence of India act of 1915, was enforced in India..^{[148][149][150][151][152]}

The events that followed the passage of the Rowlatt Act in 1919 were also influenced by the conspiracy. At the time, British Indian Army troops were returning from the battlefields of Europe and Mesopotamia to an economic depression in India.^[153][154] The attempts of mutiny in 1915 and the Lahore conspiracy trials were still in public attention. News of young Mohajirs who fought on behalf of the Turkish Caliphate and later fought in the ranks of the Red Army during the Russian Civil War was also beginning to reach India. The Russian Revolution had also cast its long shadow into India.^[155] It was at this time that Gandhi, until then relatively unknown in the Indian political scene, began emerging as a mass leader.

Ominously, in 1919, the third Anglo-Afghan war began in the wake of Amir Habibullah's assassination and institution of Amanullah in a system blatantly influenced by the Kabul mission. In addition, in India, Gandhi's call for protest against the Rowlatt act achieved an unprecedented response of furious unrest and protests. The situation especially in Punjab was deteriorating rapidly, with disruptions of rail, telegraph and communication systems. The movement was at its peak before the end of the first week of April, with some recording that "practically the whole of Lahore was on the streets, the immense crowd that passed through Anarkali was estimated to be around 20,000."^[154] In Amritsar, over 5,000 people gathered at Jallianwala Bagh. This situation deteriorated perceptibly over the next few days. Michael O'Dwyer is said to have been of the firm belief that these were the early and ill-concealed signs of a conspiracy for a coordinated uprising around May, on the lines of the 1857 revolt, at a time when British troops would have withdrawn to the hills for the summer. The Amritsar massacre, as well as responses preceding and succeeding it, contrary to being an isolated incident, was the end result of a concerted plan of response from the Punjab administration to suppress such a conspiracy.^[156] James Houssemayne Du Boulay is said to have ascribed a direct relationship between the fear of a Ghadarite uprising in the midst of an increasingly tensed situation in Punjab, and the British response that ended in the massacre.^[157]

Lastly, British efforts to downplay and disguise the nature and impact of the revolutionary movement at this time also resulted in a policy designed to strengthen the moderatist movement in India, which ultimately saw Gandhi's rise in the Indian movement.^[4]

International relations

See also: Anglo-American relations and Anglo-Japanese relations

The conspiracy influenced a number of aspects of Great Britain's international relations, most of all Anglo-American relations during the war, as well as, to some extent, Anglo-Chinese relations. After the war, it was one of the issues that influenced Anglo-Japanese relations.

At the start of the war, the American government's refusal to check the Indian seditionist movement was a major concern for the British government. By 1916, a majority of the resources of the American department of the British Foreign Office were related to the Indian seditionist movement. Before the outbreak of the war, the political commitments of the Wilson Government, (especially of Secretary of State William Jennings Bryan who had eight years previously had authored a highly critical pamphlet called the "British rule in India" classified as seditionist by the Indian and Imperial governments), and the political fallouts of the perception of persecution of oppressed people by Britain prevented the then ambassador Cecil-Spring Rice from pressing the issue diplomatically.^{[76][158][159]} After Robert Lansing replaced Bryan as Secretary of State in 1916, Secretary of State for India Marquess of Crewe and Foreign Secretary Edward Grey forced Spring-Rice to raise the issue and the evidences obtained in Lahore Conspiracy trial were presented to the American Government in February. The first investigations were opened in America at this time with the raid of the Wall Street office of Wolf von Igel, resulting in seizures of papers that were later presented as evidence in the Hindu German conspiracy trial.^[159] However, a perceptibly slow and reluctant American investigation triggered an intense neutrality dispute through 1916, aggravated by belligerent preventive measures of the British far-eastern fleet on the high seas that threatened the sovereignty of American vessels. Seizure of German and Turkish passengers from the American vessel China by the 'HMS Laurentic at the mouth of the Yangtze River, followed by a number of incidents including the SS Henry S, which were defended by the British government on grounds that the seized ship planned to forment an armed uprising in India, drew strong responses from the US government, prompting the U. S. Atlantic Fleet to dispatch Destroyers to the Pacific to protect the sovereignty of American vessels. Authorities in the Philippines were more cooperative, which assured Britain of knowledge of any plans against Hong Kong. The strained relations were relaxed in May 1916 when the Britain released the China prisoners and released relaxed its aggressive policy seeking cooperation with the United States. However, diplomatic exchanges and relations did not improve before November that year.^{[158][159][160]}

The conspiracy issue was ultimately addressed by William G. E. Wiseman, head of British intelligence in the United States, when he passed details of a bomb plot directly to the New York Police bypassing diplomatic channels. This led to the arrest of Chandra Kanta Chuckrevarty. As the links between Chuckervarty's papers and the Igel papers became apparent, investigations by federal authorities expanded to cover the entire conspiracy. Ultimately, the United States agreed to forward evidence so long as Britain did not seek admission of liability for breaches of neutrality. At a time that diplomatic relations with Germany were deteriorating, the British Foreign Office directed its Embassy to cooperate with the investigations resolving the Anglo-American diplomatic disputes just as the United States entered the war.^{[159][159][160][160]}

Through 1915-16, China (along with Indonesia) formed one of the major bases for the conspirators, and significant efforts were made by the British government to coax China into the war to attempt to control the German and Ghadar intrigues. This would also allow free purchase of arms from China for the Entente powers.^[79] However, Yuan's proposals for bringing China into the war were against Japanese interests and gains from the war. This along with Japanese support for Sun Yat Sen and rebels in southern China laid the foundations for deterioration of Anglo-Japanese relations as early as 1916.^[161] After the end of the Great War, Japan increasingly became a haven for radical Indian nationalists in exile, who were protected by patriotic Japanese societies. Notable among these were Rash Behari Bose, Tarak Nath Das, and A M Sahay. The protections offered to these nationalists, most notably by Toyama Mitsuru's Black Dragon Society,^[162][163] effectively prevented British efforts to repatriate them and became a major policy concern.^[163][164]

Ghadar Party and IIC

The IIC was formally disbanded in November 1918, with most of its members becoming closely associated with Communism and the Soviet Union.^[165] Bhupendranath Dutta and Virendranath Chattopadhyay alias Chatto arrived in Moscow in 1920. Narendranath Bhattacharya, under a new identity of M.N. Roy, was among the first Indian communists and made a memorable speech in the second congress of the Communist International that rejected Leninist views and foreshadowed Maoist peasant movements.^[151] Chatto himself was in Berlin until 1932 as the general secretary of the League Against Imperialism and was able to convince Nehru to affiliate the Indian National Congress with the league in 1927. He later fled Nazi Germany for Soviet Russia but disappeared in 1937 under Stalin's Great Purge.^[166]

The Ghadar Party, suppressed during the war, revived itself in 1920 and openly declared its communist beliefs. Although sidelined in California, it remained relatively stronger in East Asia, where it allied itself with the Chinese Communist Party.^[35][166]

World War II

Main articles: Indian Independence League, Indian National Army, and Arzi Hukumat-e-Azad Hind

Although the conspiracy failed during World War I and the movement was suppressed at the time with a number of its key leaders hanged or incarcerated, a number of prominent Ghadarites also managed to flee India to Japan and Thailand. The concept of a revolutionary movement for independence also found a revival amongst later generation Indian leaders, most notably Subhas Chandra Bose who, towards the mid-1930s, began calling for a more radical approach towards colonial domination. During World War II, a number of these leaders were instrumental in seeking Axis support to revive such a concept.^[167][168] Bose himself, from the very beginning of World War II, actively evaluated the concept of revolutionary movement against the Raj, interacting with Japan and subsequently escaping to Germany to raise an Indian armed force, the Indische Legion, to fight in India against Britain.^[169] He would later return to Southeast Asia to take charge of the Indian National Army which was formed following the labour of exiled nationalists, efforts from within Japan to revive a similar concept, and the direction and leadership of people like Mohan Singh, Giani Pritam Singh, and Rash Behari Bose. The most famous of these saw the formation of the Indian Independence League, the Indian National Army and ultimately the Arzi Hukumat-e-Azad Hind in Southeast Asia.^[170][171]

See also: Indische Legion

Commemoration

The 1915 Singapore Mutiny memorial tablet at the entrance of the Victoria Memorial Hall, Singapore.

The Ghadar Memorial Hall in San Francisco honours members of the party who were hanged following the Lahore conspiracy trial,^[172] and the Ghadar Party Memorial Hall in Jalandhar, Punjab commemorates the Ghadarites who were involved in the conspiracy. A number of those executed during the conspiracy are today honoured in India. Kartar Singh is honoured with a memorial at his birthplace of the Village of Sarabha. The Ayurvedic Medicine College in Ludhiana is also named in his honour.^[173] The Indian government has produced stamps honouring a number of those involved in the conspiracy, including Har Dayal, Bhai Paramanand, and Rash Behari Bose.^[174] A number of other revolutionaries are also honoured through India and the Indian American population. A memorial plaque commemorating the Komagata Maru was unveiled by Jawaharlal Nehru at Budge Budge in Calcutta in 1954, while a second plaque was unveiled in 1984 at Gateway Pacific, Vancouver by the Canadian government. A heritage foundation to commemorate the passengers from the Komagata Maru excluded from Canada was established in 2005.^[175] In Singapore, two memorial tablets at the entrance of the Victoria Memorial Hall and four plaques in St Andrew's Cathedral commemorate the British soldiers and civilians killed during the Singapore Mutiny.^[176] In Ireland, a memorial at the Glasnevin Cemetery in Dublin commemorates the dead from the Jalandhar mutiny of the Connaught Rangers.^[177] The Southern Asian Institute of Columbia University today runs the Taraknath Das foundation to support work relating to India.^[178] Famous awardees include R K Narayan, Robert Goheen, Philip Talbot, Anita Desai and SAKHI and Joseph Elder.

Note on the name

The conspiracy is known under a number of different names, including the Hindu Conspiracy, the Indo-German Conspiracy, the Ghadar conspiracy (or Ghadr conspiracy), or the German plot.^{[33][179][180][181][182]} The term Hindu–German Conspiracy is closely associated with the uncovering of the Annie Larsen plot in the United States, and the ensuing trial of Indian Nationalists and the staff of the German Consulate of San Francisco for violating American neutrality. The trial itself was called the Hindu-German Conspiracy trial, and the Conspiracy was reported in the media (and later studied by a number of historians) as Hindu–German Conspiracy.^[139] However, the Conspiracy involved not only Hindus and Germans, but also substantial numbers of Muslims and Punjabi Sikhs as well, along with strong Irish support that pre-dated German and Turkish involvement. The term Hindu was used commonly in opprobrium in America to identify Indians regardless of religion. Likewise, conspiracy was also a negative term. The term Hindu Conspiracy was used by the government to actively discredit the Indian revolutionaries at a time the United States was about to join the war against Germany.^{[139][183][184]}

The term Ghadar Conspiracy may refer more specifically to the mutiny planned for February 1915 in India, while the term German plot or Christmas Day Plot may refer more specifically to the plans for shipping arms to Jatin Mukherjee in Autumn 1915. The term Indo-German conspiracy is also commonly used to refer to later plans in Southeast Asia and to the mission to Kabul which remained the remnant of the conspiracy at the end of the war. All of these were parts of the larger conspiracy. Most scholars reviewing the American aspect use the name Hindu–German Conspiracy, the Hindu-Conspiracy or the Ghadar Conspiracy, while most reviewing the conspiracy over its entire span from Southeast Asia through Europe to the United States more often use the term Indo-German conspiracy.^[182][185]

Notes and references

Notes

1. ^ ^{a b c d e f} Plowman 2003, p. 84
2. ^ ^{a b c d} Hoover 1985, p. 252
3. ^ ^{a b} Brown 1948, p. 300
4. ^ ^{a b} Popplewell 1995, p. 4
5. ^ Desai 2005, p. 30
6. ^ Desai 2005, p. 43
7. ^ Desai 2005, p. 93
8. ^ Desai 2005, p. 125
9. ^ Desai 2005, p. 154
10. ^ Yadav 1992, p. 6
11. ^ ^{a b} Fraser 1977, p. 257
12. ^ Bose & Jalal 1998, p. 117
13. ^ Dutta & Desai 2003, p. 135
14. ^ Bhatt 2001, p. 83
15. ^ ^{a b c d e f g} Gupta 1997, p. 12
16. ^ Popplewell 1995, p. 201
17. ^ ^{a b c d} Strachan 2001, p. 795
18. ^ Terrorism in Bengal, Compiled and Edited by A.K. Samanta, Government of West Bengal, 1995, Vol. II, p625.
19. ^ ^{a b c} Qureshi 1999, p. 78
20. ^ ^{a b c} "Champak-Chatto" And the Berlin Committee". Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan. http://www.bhavans.info/heritage/champakchatto.asp. Retrieved on 2007-11-04.
21. ^ ^{a b} Strachan 2001, p. 794
22. ^ Yadav 1992, p. 8
23. ^ Hopkirk 1997, p. 44
24. ^ Owen 2007, p. 65
25. ^ Owen 2007, p. 66
26. ^ Chirol 2006, p. 148
27. ^ von Pochammer 2005, p. 435
28. ^ Popplewell 1995, p. 132
29. ^ Fischer-Tinē 2007, p. 333
30. ^ ^{a b} Fischer-Tinē 2007, p. 334
31. ^ ^{a b} Fischer-Tinē 2007, p. 334
32. ^ ^{a b} Fischer-Tinē 2007, p. 335
33. ^ ^{a b} Plowman 2003, p. 82
34. ^ ^{a b c} Popplewell 1995, p. 148
35. ^ ^{a b c} Deepak 1999, p. 441
36. ^ ^{a b} Sarkar 1983, p. 146
37. ^ Deepak 1999, p. 439
38. ^ ^{a b c} Hoover 1985, p. 251
39. ^ Strachan 2001, p. 798
40. ^ ^{a b c d} Gupta 1997, p. 11
41. ^ ^{a b} Puri 1980, p. 60
42. ^ Hopkirk 2001, p. 96
43. ^ Ward 2002, p. 79-96
44. ^ ^{a b c d} Strachan 2001, p. 796
45. ^ Strachan 2001, p. 793
46. ^ ^{a b c} Deepak 1999, p. 442
47. ^ ^{a b} Sarkar 1983, p. 148
48. ^ ^{a b} Brown 1948, p. 303
49. ^ Plowman 2003, p. 87
50. ^ ^{a b} Brown 1948, p. 301
51. ^ Brown 1948, p. 301
52. ^ Popplewell 1995, p. 276
53. ^ ^{a b} Brown 1948, p. 306
54. ^ Brown 1948, p. 307
55. ^ ^{a b} Popplewell 1995, p. 224
56. ^ ^{a b} Popplewell 1995, p. 225
57. ^ ^{a b} Fraser 1977, p. 261
58. ^ Plowman 2003, p. 90
59. ^ ^{a b c} Gupta 1997, p. 3
60. ^ Hoover 1985, p. 255
61. ^ ^{a b} Wilma D (May 18, 2006). "U.S. Customs at Grays Harbor seizes the schooner Annie Larsen loaded with arms and ammunition on June 29, 1915". HistoryLink.org. http://www.historylink.org/essays/output.cfm?file_id=7753. Retrieved on 2007-09-22.
62. ^ ^{a b} Hoover 1985, p. 256
63. ^ Brown 1948, p. 304
64. ^ Stafford, D. "Men of Secrets. Roosevelt and Churchill.". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/books/first/s/stafford-roosevelt.html. Retrieved on 2007-10-24.
65. ^ Myonihan, D.P. "Report of the Commission on on Protecting and Reducing Government Secrecy. Senate Document 105-2". Fas.org. http://www.fas.org/sgp/library/moynihan/appa2.html. Retrieved on 2007-10-24.
66. ^ Chhabra 2005, p. 597
67. ^ ^{a b} Deepak 1999, p. 443
68. ^ ^{a b} Strachan 2001, p. 796
69. ^ ^{a b} Herbert 2003, p. 223
70. ^ ^{a b} Sareen 1995, p. 14,15
71. ^ Kuwajima 1988, p. 23
72. ^ Farwell 1992, p. 244
73. ^ Corr 1975, p. 15
74. ^ Strachan 2001, p. 797
75. ^ ^{a b} Fraser 1977, p. 263
76. ^ ^{a b c d} Strachan 2001, p. 800
77. ^ Hopkirk 2001, p. 189
78. ^ ^{a b} Fraser 1977, p. 264
79. ^ ^{a b c d e f} Strachan 2001, p. 802
80. ^ Hopkirk 2001, p. 179
81. ^ ^{a b} Majumdar 1971, p. 382
82. ^ Puri 1980, p. 60
83. ^ ^{a b} Fraser 1977, p. 266
84. ^ Fraser 1977, p. 267
85. ^ Hopkirk 2001, p. 180
86. ^ Fraser 1977, p. 265
87. ^ Hughes 2002, p. 453
88. ^ Hopkirk 2001, p. 98
89. ^ Hopkirk 2001, p. 136-140
90. ^ Jalal 2007, p. 105
91. ^ Reetz 2007, p. 142
92. ^ Hughes 2002, p. 466
93. ^ Hopkirk 2001, p. 160
94. ^ Sims-Williams 1980, p. 120
95. ^ Hughes 2002, p. 472
96. ^ Andreyev 2003, p. 95
97. ^ Andreyev 2003, p. 87
98. ^ Andreyev 2003, p. 96
99. ^ ^{a b c} McKale 1998, p. 127
100. ^ Yadav 1992, p. 35
101. ^ ^{a b} Yadav 1992, p. 36
102. ^ ^{a b} Yadav 1992, p. 35
103. ^ Qureshi 1999, p. 78
104. ^ Sykes 1921, p. 101
105. ^ ^{a b} Herbert 2003
106. ^ Singh, Jaspal. "History of the Ghadar Movement". panjab.org.uk. http://www.panjab.org.uk/english/histGPty.html. Retrieved on 2007-10-31.
107. ^ Asghar, S.B (June 12, 2005). "A famous uprising". www.dawn.com. http://www.dawn.com/weekly/dmag/archive/050612/dmag14.htm. Retrieved on 2007-11-02.
108. ^ Strachan 2001, p. 805
109. ^ Kenny 2006, p. 111
110. ^ Singh, T.R (May 29, 1999). "The mutiny of Connaught Rangers". thetribuneindia.com. http://www.tribuneindia.com/1999/99may29/saturday/head9.htm. Retrieved on 2007-10-07.
111. ^ ^{a b c} Hopkirk 2001, p. 41
112. ^ ^{a b} Popplewell 1995, p. 168
113. ^ ^{a b} Popplewell 1995, p. 200
114. ^ Popplewell 1995, p. 194
115. ^ ^{a b} Popplewell 1995, p. 173
116. ^ Hopkirk 2002, p. 182
117. ^ Strachan 2001, p. 788
118. ^ Popplewell 1995, p. 216,217
119. ^ Popplewell 1995, p. 230
120. ^ Woods 2007, p. 55
121. ^ Popplewell 1995, p. 234
122. ^ Barooah 2004
123. ^ Voska & Irwin 1940, p. 98,108,120,122,123
124. ^ ^{a b} Masaryk 1970, p. 50,221,242
125. ^ Bose 1971, p. 233,233
126. ^ Popplewell 1995, p. 237
127. ^ Collett 2006, p. 144
128. ^ Popplewell 1995, p. 182,183,187
129. ^ Seidt 2001, p. 4
130. ^ "Echoes of Freedom:South Asian pioneers in California 1899-1965.". UC, Berkley, Bancroft Library. http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/SSEAL/echoes/chapter7/chapter7.html. Retrieved on 2007-11-11.
131. ^ Popplewell 1995, p. 147
132. ^ Radhan 2001, p. 259
133. ^ Radhan 2001, p. 261
134. ^ Plowman 2003, p. 93
135. ^ Chhabra 2005, p. 598
136. ^ Talbot 2000, p. 124
137. ^ "History of Andaman Cellular Jail". Andaman Cellular Jail heritage committee. http://www.andamancellularjail.org/History.htm#Link9. Retrieved on 2007-12-08.
138. ^ Khosla, K (June 23, 2002). "Ghadr revisited". The Tribune, Chandigarh. http://www.tribuneindia.com/2002/20020623/spectrum/book2.htm. Retrieved on 2007-12-08.
139. ^ ^{a b c} Jensen 1979, p. 65
140. ^ Dignan 1971, p. 75
141. ^ Dignan 1971, p. 57
142. ^ ^{a b} Majumdar 1971, p. xix
143. ^ ^{a b c} Dignan 1971, p. 60
144. ^ ^{a b} Cole 2001, p. 572
145. ^ Hopkirk 1997, p. 43
146. ^ Sinha 1971, p. 153
147. ^ Ker 1917
148. ^ ^{a b} Popplewell 1995, p. 175
149. ^ Lovett 1920, p. 94, 187-191
150. ^ Sarkar 1921, p. 137
151. ^ ^{a b} Tinker 1968, p. 92
152. ^ Fisher 1972, p. 129
153. ^ Sarkar 1983, p. 169-172,176
154. ^ ^{a b} Swami P (November 1, 1997). "Jallianwala Bagh revisited". The Hindu. http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl1422/14220500.htm. Retrieved on 2007-10-07.
155. ^ Sarkar 1983, p. 177
156. ^ Cell 2002, p. 67
157. ^ Brown 1973, p. 523
158. ^ ^{a b} Fraser 1977, p. 260
159. ^ ^{a b c d e} Strachan 2001, p. 804
160. ^ ^{a b c} Dignan 1971
161. ^ Strachan 2001, p. 803
162. ^ Tagore 1997, p. 486
163. ^ ^{a b} Brown 1986, p. 421
164. ^ Dignan 1983
165. ^ Strachan 2001, p. 815
166. ^ ^{a b} Fraser 1977, p. 269
167. ^ Lebra 1977, p. 23
168. ^ Lebra 1977, p. 24
169. ^ Thomson M (September 23, 2004). "Hitler's secret Indian Army". bbc.co.uk. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/3684288.stm. Retrieved on 2007-09-02.
170. ^ Fay 1993, p. 90
171. ^ "Historical Journey of the Indian National Army". National Archives of Singapore. 2003. http://www.s1942.org.sg/s1942/indian_national_army/revival.htm. Retrieved on 2007-07-07.
172. ^ Radhan 2002, p. 203
173. ^ "Pioneer Asian Indian immigration to the Pacific coast". Sikhpioneers.org. http://www.sikhpioneers.org/gadarphoto.html. Retrieved on 2007-12-09.
174. ^ "Bhai Paramanand". IndianPost,Adarsh Mumbai News and Feature Agency. http://www.indianpost.com/viewstamp.php/Color/Blue%20Gray/BHAI%20PARMANAND. Retrieved on 2007-12-09.
175. ^ "Komagata Maru Walk 2006". Komagata Maru Heritage Foundation. http://www.komagatamaru.ca/foundation.asp?id=3. Retrieved on 2007-12-09.
176. ^ "1915 Indian (Singapore) Mutiny". Singapore Infopedia. http://infopedia.nlb.gov.sg/articles/SIP_570_2005-01-24.html. Retrieved on 2007-06-14.
177. ^ Wilkinson & Ashley 1993, p. 48
178. ^ >"The Taraknath Das Foundation". Columbia University. http://www.sipa.columbia.edu/sai/tdas.html. Retrieved on 2008-05-21.
179. ^ Jensen 1979, p. 83
180. ^ Plowman 2003, p. Footnote 2
181. ^ Isemonger & Slattery 1919
182. ^ ^{a b} "Bagha Jatin". www.whereinthecity.com. http://www.whereincity.com/india/great-indians/freedom-fighters/bagha-jatin.php. Retrieved on 2007-12-10.
183. ^ Jensen 1979, p. 67
184. ^ Strother 2004, p. 308
185. ^ "Dr. Matt Plowman to have conference paper published". Waldorf College. April 14, 2005. http://www.waldorf.edu/news/nm/anmviewer.asp?a=360. Retrieved on 2007-12-10.

References

• Andreyev, Alexandre (2003), Soviet Russia and Tibet: The Debacle of Secret Diplomacy, 1918-1930s, BRILL, ISBN 9004129529.
• Ansari, K. H. (1986), Pan-Islam and the Making of the Early Indian Muslim Socialist. Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 20, No. 3. (1986), pp. 509-537, Cambridge University Press.
• Barooah, N. K. (2004), Chatto: The Life and Times of an Anti-Imperialist in Europe, Oxford University Press, USA., ISBN 0195665473.
• Bhatt, Chetan (2001), Hindu Nationalism: Origins, Ideologies and Modern Myths, Berg Publishers, ISBN 1859733484.
• Bose, A. C. (1971), Indian Revolutionaries Abroad,1905-1927, Patna:Bharati Bhawan., ISBN 8172111231.
• Bose, Purnima & Laura Lyons (1999), Dyer Consequences: The Trope of Amritsar, Ireland, and the Lessons of the "Minimum" Force Debate.boundary 2, Vol. 26, No. 2. (Summer, 1999), pp. 199-229, Duke University Press, ISSN: 01903659.
• Bose, Sugata & Ayesha Jalal (1998), Modern South Asia: History, Culture, Political Economy, Routledge, ISBN 0415169526.
• Brown, Emily (1973), (in Book Reviews; South Asia). The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 32, No. 3. (May, 1973), pp. 522-523, Pacific Affairs, University of British Columbia.

• Brown, Emily (1986), (in Book Reviews; South Asia). The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 45, No. 2, Pacific Affairs, University of British Columbia..
• Brown, Giles (1948), The Hindu Conspiracy, 1914-1917.The Pacific Historical Review, Vol. 17, No. 3. (Aug., 1948), pp. 299-310, University of California Press, ISSN 0030-8684.
• Carr, Cecil T., et al. (1938), British Isles (in Review of Legislation, 1936; British Empire. Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law, 3rd Ser., Vol. 20, No. 2. (1938), pp. 1-25, Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Institute of International and Comparative Law, ISSN: 14795949.
• Cell, John W. (2002), Hailey: A Study in British Imperialism, 1872-1969, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0521521173.
• Chhabra, G. S. (2005), Advance Study In The History Of Modern India (Volume-2: 1803-1920), Lotus Press, ISBN 818909307X, <http://www.a1books.co.in/searchdetail.do?itemCode=818909307X>.
• Chirol, Valentine (2006), Indian Unrest, Adamant Media Corporation, ISBN 0543941221.
• Cole, Howard, et al. (2001), Labour and Radical Politics 1762-1937, Routledge, ISBN 0415265762.
• Collett, Nigel (2006), The Butcher of Amritsar: General Reginald Dyer, Continuum International Publishing Group, ISBN 1852855754.
• Corr, Gerald H. (1975), The War of the Springing Tigers:, Osprey, ISBN 0850450691.
• Deepak, B. R. (1999), Revolutionary Activities of the Ghadar Party in China. China Report 1999; 35; 439, Sage Publications, ISSN: 0009-4455.
• Desai, A. R. (2005), Social Background of Indian Nationalism, Popular Prakashan, ISBN 8171546676.
• Dignan, Don (1971), The Hindu Conspiracy in Anglo-American Relations during World War I.The Pacific Historical Review, Vol. 40, No. 1. (Feb., 1971), pp. 57-76, University of California Press, ISSN 0030-8684.
• Dignan, Don (1983), The Indian revolutionary problem in British Diplomacy,1914-1919, New Delhi, Allied Publishers.
• Dutta, Krishna & Anita Desai (2003), Calcutta: A Cultural and Literary History, Signal Books, ISBN 1902669592.
• Fay, Peter W. (1993), The Forgotten Army: India's Armed Struggle for Independence, 1942-1945., Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, ISBN 0472083422.
• Farwell, Bryon (1992), Armies of the Raj: From the Great Indian Mutiny to Independence, 1858-1947, W. W. Norton & Company, Incorporated, ISBN 0393308022.
• Fischer-Tinē, Harald (2007), Indian Nationalism and the ‘world forces’: Transnational and diasporic dimensions of the Indian freedom movement on the eve of the First World War. Journal of Global History (2007) 2, pp. 325–344, Cambridge University Press., ISSN: 1740-0228.
• Fisher, Margaret W. (1972), Essays on Gandhian Politics. the Rowlatt Satyagraha of 1919 (in Book Reviews). Pacific Affairs, Vol. 45, No. 1 (Spring, 1972), pp. 128-129, Pacific Affairs, University of British Columbia.
• Fraser, Thomas G. (1977), Germany and Indian Revolution, 1914-18. Journal of Contemporary History, Vol. 12, No. 2 (Apr., 1977), pp. 255-272, Sage Publications, ISSN: 00220094.
• Gupta, Amit K. (1997), Defying Death: Nationalist Revolutionism in India, 1897-1938.Social Scientist, Vol. 25, No. 9/10. (Sep. - Oct., 1997), pp. 3-27, Social Scientist, ISSN: 09700293.
• Herbert, Edwin (2003), Small Wars and Skirmishes 1902-1918: Early Twentieth-century Colonial Campaigns in Africa, Asia and the Americas, Nottingham, Foundry Books Publications.
• Hoover, Karl (1985), The Hindu Conspiracy in California, 1913-1918. German Studies Review, Vol. 8, No. 2. (May, 1985), pp. 245-261, German Studies Association, ISBN 01497952.
• Hopkirk, Peter (1997), Like Hidden Fire: The Plot to Bring Down the British Empire., Kodansha Globe, ISBN 1568361270.
• Hopkirk, Peter (2001), On Secret Service East of Constantinople, Oxford Paperbacks, ISBN 0192802305.
• Hughes, Thomas L. (2002), The German Mission to Afghanistan, 1915-1916.German Studies Review, Vol. 25, No. 3. (Oct., 2002), pp. 447-476, German Studies Association, ISSN: 01497952.
• Isemonger, F. C. & J Slattery (1919), An Account of the Ghadr Conspiracy, 1913 - 1915, Lahore: India Government Printing Office-Punjab.
• Jalal, Ayesha (2007), Striking a just balance: Maulana Azad as a theorist of trans-national jihad. Modern Intellectual History, 4, 1 (2007), pp. 95–107, Cambridge University Press, ISSN 1479-2443.
• Jensen, Joan M. (1979), The "Hindu Conspiracy": A Reassessment. The Pacific Historical Review, Vol. 48, No. 1. (Feb., 1979), pp. 65-83, University of California Press, ISSN 0030-8684.
• Kenny, Kevin (2006), Ireland and the British Empire, Oxford University Press, ISBN 0199251843.
• Ker, J. C. (1917), Political Trouble in India 1907-1917, Calcutta. Superintendent Government Printing, India, 1917. Republished 1973 by Delhi, Oriental Publishers, OCLC: 1208166.
• Kuwajima, Sho (1988), First World War and Asia — Indian Mutiny in Singapore (1915).Journal of Osaka University of Foreign Studies Vol 69,pp. 23-48, Osaka University of Foreign studies.
• Lebra, Joyce C. (1977), Japanese trained armies in South-East Asia, New York, Columbia University Press, ISBN 0231039956.
• Lovett, Sir Verney (1920), A History of the Indian Nationalist Movement, New York, Frederick A. Stokes Company, ISBN 81-7536-249-9.
• Majumdar, Ramesh C. (1971), History of the Freedom Movement in India (Vol II), Firma K. L. Mukhopadhyay, ISBN 8171020992.
• Masaryk, T. (1970), Making of a State, Howard Fertig, ISBN 0685095754.
• McKale, Donald M (1998), War by Revolution: Germany and Great Britain in the Middle East in the Era of World War I, Kent State University Press, ISBN 0873386027.
• Owen, N. (2007), The British Left and India, Oxford University Press, ISBN 0199233012.

• Plowman, Matthew (2003), Irish Republicans and the Indo-German Conspiracy of World War I. New Hibernia Review 7.3 pp 81-105, Center for Irish Studies at the University of St. Thomas, ISBN 10923977.
• Popplewell, Richard J. (1995), Intelligence and Imperial Defence: British Intelligence and the Defence of the Indian Empire 1904-1924., Routledge, ISBN 071464580X, <http://www.routledge.com/shopping_cart/products/product_detail.asp?sku=&isbn=071464580X&parent_id=&pc=>.
• Puri, Harish K. (1980), Revolutionary Organization: A Study of the Ghadar Movement. Social Scientist, Vol. 9, No. 2/3. (Sep. - Oct., 1980), pp. 53-66, Social Scientist, ISSN: 09700293.
• Qureshi, M. Naeem (1999), Pan-Islam in British Indian Politics: A Study of the Khilafat Movement, 1918-1924., Brill Academic Publishers, ISBN 9004113711.
• Radhan, O. P. (2002), Encyclopaedia of Political Parties, Anmol Publications Pvt ltd, ISBN 8174888659.
• Reetz, Dietrich (2007), The Deoband Universe: What Makes a Transcultural and Transnational Educational Movement of Islam?. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa, and the Middle East. Vol.27. No.1. pp. 139-159, Duke University press, ISSN 1089-201X.
• Sareen, Tilak R. (1995), Secret Documents On Singapore Mutiny 1915., Mounto Publishing House, New Delhi, ISBN 8174510095.
• Sarkar, B. K. (1921), Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 36, No. 1. (Mar., 1921), pp. 136-138, The Acedemy of Political Science, ISSN: 00323195.
• Sarkar, Sumit (1983), Modern India, 1885-1947, Delhi:Macmillan, ISBN 9780333904251.
• Seidt, Hans-Ulrich (2001), From Palestine to the Caucasus-Oskar Niedermayer and Germany's Middle Eastern Strategy in 1918.German Studies Review, Vol. 24, No. 1. (Feb., 2001), pp. 1-18, German Studies Association.
• Sims-Williams, Ursula (1980), The Afghan Newspaper Siraj al-Akhbar. Bulletin (British Society for Middle Eastern Studies), Vol. 7, No. 2. (1980), pp. 118-122, London, Taylor & Francis Ltd.
• Sinha, P. B. (1971), A New Source for the History of the Revolutionary Movement in India, 1907- 1917.The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 31, No. 1. (Nov., 1971), pp. 151-156, Association for Asian Studies.
• Strachan, Hew (2001), The First World War. Volume I: To Arms, Oxford University Press. USA, ISBN 0199261911.
• Strother, French (2004), Fighting germany's spies, Kessinger Publishing, ISBN 1417931698.
• Sykes, Peter (1921), South Persia and the Great War. The Geographical Journal, Vol. 58, No. 2 (Aug., 1921), pp. 101-116, Blackwell Publishing on behalf of The Royal Geographical Society, ISSN: 00167398.
• Tagore, Rabindranath (1997), Selected Letters of Rabindranath Tagore, University of Cambridge Oriental Publications, ISBN 0521590183.
• Tai-Yong, Tan (2000), An Imperial Home-Front: Punjab and the First World War. The Journal of Military History, Vol. 64, No. 2 (Apr., 2000), pp. 371-410, Society for Military History, ISSN: 08993718.
• Talbot, Ian (2000), India and Pakistan, Oxford University Press USA., ISBN 0340706325.
• Tinker, Hugh (1968), India in the First World War and after. Journal of Contemporary History, Vol. 3, No. 4, 1918-19: From War to Peace. (Oct., 1968), pp. 89-107, Sage Publications, ISSN: 00220094.
• von Pochhammer, Wilhelm (2005), India's Road to Nationhood. (2nd edition), Allied Publishers., ISBN 8177647156.
• Voska, E. V. & W. Irwin (1940), Spy and Counterspy, New York. Doubleday, Doran & Co.
• Ward, W. P. (2002), White Canada Forever: Popular Attitudes and Public Policy Toward Orientals in British Columbia (McGill-Queen's Studies in Ethnic History). 3^rd ed, McGill-Queen's University Press, ISBN 0773523227
• Wilkinson, P. & J. B. Ashley (1993), Gubbins and SOE, Leo Cooper, ISBN 085052556X.
• Woods, B. F. (2007), Neutral Ground: A Political History of Espionage Fiction., Algora Publishing, ISBN 0875865356.
• Yadav, B. D. (1992), M. P. T. Acharya, Reminiscences of an Indian Revolutionary, Anmol Publications Pvt ltd, ISBN 8170414709.